<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stack error with VS2005</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.guangmingsoft.net/wordpress/stack-error-with-vs2005/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.guangmingsoft.net/wordpress/stack-error-with-vs2005/</link>
	<description>Just for keeping memories</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ming</title>
		<link>http://www.guangmingsoft.net/wordpress/stack-error-with-vs2005/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>ming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guangmingsoft.net/wordpress/index.php/122/stack-error-with-vs2005/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>No, we don\'t have update on this yet.

What is your concern on using a second thread? It will not introduce any problem like performance or security etc.

Ming</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, we don\&#8217;t have update on this yet.</p>
<p>What is your concern on using a second thread? It will not introduce any problem like performance or security etc.</p>
<p>Ming</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmetzner</title>
		<link>http://www.guangmingsoft.net/wordpress/stack-error-with-vs2005/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>jmetzner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guangmingsoft.net/wordpress/index.php/122/stack-error-with-vs2005/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Did you ever figure out how to change the code so that this wasn't necessary?  I'm having the problem with our custom version of PDFSecurity, and I'd rather not code another thread if I don't have to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever figure out how to change the code so that this wasn&#8217;t necessary?  I&#8217;m having the problem with our custom version of PDFSecurity, and I&#8217;d rather not code another thread if I don&#8217;t have to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
